4% spread; Obama v. Clinton at 1736 v. 1599. Turnout was huge, up to 4,000. (Update: Reuters is saying maybe over 5,000).
[updates with new tables when results known - hopefully later today].
DEMOCRATIC SUPERDELEGATES CONTINUE TO LET CLINTONS LIE TO ELECTORATE
Ultimately, that has to be bad for party politics, I don't care how many new people register. When the lie comes undone, people are not going to understand and are going to be angry.
Separately, the other Clinton continues to lie to voters:
Hillary in North Caroline: “This is going to make a huge difference in what happens going forward. The entire country – probably even a lot of the world - is looking to see what North Carolina decides.” - link
That's right. The "world" is looking on in horror at American democracy, I'd bet. There is still blood dripping from Hannity's mouth over his feast on Wright, and he's still turning the knife, there.
Both Clintons are doubled-down on the idea that a loss for Obama is a game-changer in NC.
It simply is not.
Clinton would have to win North Carolina by 92%-8%, just to wipe out Obama's lead among elected delegates. If you do not include MI and FL delegates, she could win the entire state (100%-zip) and it would NOT put her into the lead among elected delegates.
