/* Google Analytics Code asynchronous */

Thursday, April 17, 2008

Erasing Redline Issues: Iran

THE PARTY OF IDEAS

How you can get dumb taking cues from George Stephanopoulos:

Iran Analysts Look to Reframe the Debate
By Matt Korade, CQ Staff

To engage or confront Iran: That is the question on one of the most critical issues of the day — the Middle East nation’s nuclear program. But Matthew Levitt, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute on Near East Policy, told a Capitol Hill audience Tuesday that the question is being framed the wrong way. The two options, engagement or confrontation, are poles of a spectrum whose middle ground offers a number of alternatives, with sanctions one possibility, said Levitt, who was participating in a panel discussion of the outlook for U.S.-Iranian relations over the next decade. ...

Right now, however, sanctions are seen not as one tool, but the tool, a problem akin to “constantly hitting the sink with a hammer,” Levitt said. The main thrust of actions against Iran should be to paralyze its aggressive behavior, ...