She also lost that new-Clinton benign smile, that newly poll-tested glow. Instead we got an occasionally droning, lecturing, and unrelenting stream of tight-faced opportunism. -AS
See? All these people who say with a two-face that they want all the calculating and posturing to stop.
As soon as it may have, they are ready with a skewer. [Completely two-faced, I might add, if one considers that queen of studied "drone" and certainly of "lecture", Maggie Thatcher ... update: even, "unsmiling baroness" ]
It's like the Clinton "cackle". I didn't object to her laugh. I thought it was genuine. It showed exactly when/where she thought someone was spewing up a easily recognizable hypocrisy or spin, which she usually was able to spell out as to why.
But, the freakshow didn't like a 'knowing laugh' at the comedy of it all, a "cackle".
Now, the freakshow doesn't like her ... lack of a smile.
If nothing else, "Give 'em hell, Hill!", I say.
