/* Google Analytics Code asynchronous */

Tuesday, October 23, 2007

VVS, Part 2: Republicans Brazenly Stir Up Religious-Political Tensions, As the Rest of the World Tries to Calm Them

BAD FOR NATIONAL SECURITY

Threatening "fight" and "no compromise" to protect their self-described faith-based "values", Republicans stirred up millions of Americans in ways that, no doubt, caused great concern around the world, to a family of nations whose efforts to get along peacefully and to broker workable compromises are decried as "multiculturalist" appeasement.

Casting the entire set of world events as U.S.-versus-Them, Godless them, is broadly deleterious to the Hope of peace, based on the willingness and ability of peoples to settle conflict by non-violent means.

THE HERETIC HUCKABEE

What? Too far with that? Isn't that what they imply about "Godless" liberals? Why can't I relate to them in the terms that they want to relate to me? No? Well, consider how much he says that is not scriptural.

Like most candidates, he calls for a religious-based "right to life", which typically is taken to imply an inviolate right that starts at conception. There is no scriptural evidence that life starts at conception. It is misleading to suggest so. The notion that an inviolate right exists is debatable.

Casting the entire set of world events as U.S.-versus-Them, Godless them, is broadly deleterious to the Hope of peace, based on the willingness and ability of peoples to settle conflict by non-violent means.
The same is true about marriage, but in a slightly different way. These are the sins of omission, in which polygamy, for instance, is most certainly part of the scriptural message but never mentioned. The notion that two men or two women must not marry is no where to be found in the scriptures, which are silent on the matter. Even orthodox Jews, who surely know the Pentateuch as well as a former Southern Baptist minister, are not all towing the same line on what is forbidden ("abomination", which conjures notions of horror, is a poor translation of a term used for what is lawful and what is not).

Finally, Huckabee rightly counsels voters not to confuse "G-o-d" with "G-O-P", but fails to explain why value voters ought not, therefore, to run a third-party candidate or invite non-GOP candidates to speak to their misled flock.

ANTI-INTELLECTUALISM

The insults to the judiciary are worthy of the Taliban. There are too many from among the candidates to list, perhaps.

The systematic, concerted, well-funded attack on the courts, up to an including calls for impeachment of judges who write opinions that one finds disagreeable, is profoundly disturbing, as it undermines the rule of law in the Nation, directly and also by confusing Justice with the rule-of-most-popular.

Most of the candidates must know that Roe-v.-Wade is not the current state of the law, yet they compromise their integrity by calling for "the repeal of Roe-v.-Wade", anyway.

CHRISTIAN SUPREMACISTS UNITE

Candidate Tancredo reminded the Christians "values voters" that Europe was building the largest mosque in the world. What is the subtext to that fact? That Europe hasn't controlled immigration based upon religious creed and implying a warning to the world that a Trancredo Administration might consider hanging out "No Muslims Need Apply" at the INS (now "CIS").