The "blogosphere" seems silent on ABC News' decision generously not to release a list of names given over by the "DC Madam". Even Bill O'Reilly was on-board with non-disclosure (can you believe it?), not to "out" adultery, etc.
Ask yourself, what if this list had been given to Drudge? humm... dunno. I've been busy with lots of other stuff, so I could be wrong about the play it has gotten, but it is an interesting lacuna in perceptions of "coverage" nonetheless.
(edit: Not that I think that her list ought to have been published, but it's odd that the 'normal' voices for disclosure appear somewhat absent.)