A promising start.
"Tough talk is not a substitute for sound judgment."
What do you think he ought to add?
hummm...
Well, he's got the attack, the Iraq positioning, and a nice tie-in with the politics of division. How would you compare this with the tightly-worded broadsides that McCain has sent about Hope and so forth? Favorably, unfavorably? Just a different style?
Arguably, he needs to fill out the "core" elements of a broader policy; now, before it turns into call-and-response.
Compare McCain's webpage on National Security with Obama's webpage. Then, when you look at Hillary's approach, Paglia's nonsense about workaholics comes into the laughable perspective that it is (even admitting that this piece blurs the line between action-items and policy).
Last, here's John in a nutshell:
Why is that message so appealing? If someone offers you the benefits of "safe, strong, and free" for nothing except the asking, ...
Last, did you notice that John McCain's National Security webpage doesn't use the word "diplomacy" at all and mentions "alliance" only once?
P.S. YOUR TAX BILL IS GOING WAY UP TO KEEP FREEDOM FREE
p.s. We are committed to bringing the troops home, but we are also building up forces (to fight the last
A bigger standing army to pay for, an ongoing war that naturally creates all kinds of inflation in military costs (healthcare, salary, recruitment, equipment, etc.).
